Comparison Matrix

Side-by-Side Comparison of V-Loc™, Stratafix™, and Quill™

Comprehensive visual comparison across device characteristics, clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and evidence base

How to Read This Matrix

Positive/Advantage

Data shows superior outcome or evidence

Neutral/Comparable

Similar outcomes or not significantly different

Caution/Limitation

Limited data, adverse events, or concerns noted

Quick Filter by Device
Click a device to highlight its column throughout the matrix
MetricV-Loc™Stratafix™Quill™
Manufacturer

Medtronic

Ethicon (J&J)

Corza Medical

Design Type

Unidirectional

Bidirectional

Bidirectional

Material

Absorbable polymer

Absorbable polymer

Absorbable polymer

Quick Summary

V-Loc™
Unidirectional Design
Largest evidence base (4,452 patients)
73% reduction in infections (RR 0.26)
Only device with endometriosis RCT
Zero bowel complications (25 studies)
Stratafix™
Bidirectional Design
Gentle learning curve for less experienced surgeons
Bidirectional design offers flexibility
FDA MAUDE reports of suture extrusion
Limited comparative safety data
Quill™
Bidirectional Design
44-minute operative time reduction (myomectomy)
0% vaginal cuff dehiscence in studies
Reduced hospital stay (0.58 vs 0.97 days)
1 bowel obstruction case reported

Using This Matrix

This comparison matrix is designed to support clinical decision-making and professional discussions about barbed suture selection. Use it to quickly reference key metrics, compare outcomes, and identify areas where evidence is strong or limited.

Note: All data is based on peer-reviewed publications and meta-analyses. Individual institutional experience may vary. Clinical decisions should be made in consultation with your surgical team and based on your specific patient population and procedures.